
If the mouse is performing some form of multiplication for cpi boosting then you may be able to see that here as skipped counting steps. You can also see data path clipping here if the data plateaus at a fixed value (e.g. You can also sometimes see angle snapping / prediction here (the counts will go to zero and hold there even though you moved the mouse with a slight arc). If the mouse looses tracking then you will see the counts go erratic. If the counts deviate too much from the line then the mouse tracking may not appear smooth. For a mouse that does not loose tracking you will see the counts generally bouncing above and below the line without much deviation. The line is a moving average of the data and is provided as a general reference to gauge the consistency of the reporting from the mouse. Time: This is for looking at the raw counts from the mouse. Reuter et al., in 30th International Conference on Phenomena in Ionized Gases, 28 August–2 September 2011, Belfast, Northern Ireland, UK, Vol. (01)00752-9, Google Scholar Crossref, ISI All these mitigations proved highly efficient, but the utmost benefits for skin damage reduction were connected to skin temperature reduction, the reduction in reactive oxygen species (ROS), and the increase in reactive nitrogen species (RNS).

Then, the skin damage caused by a He plasma jet was explored, focusing on damage mitigation with different liquid interfaces applied to the treatment site, adding N 2 to the gas mixture, or alternating the gas flow dynamics by elongating the jet's glass orifice with a funnel. The results pointed to the perpendicular orientation of a He plasma jet as the most promising condition with the least skin damage. First, the focus was on exploring plasma effects on skin damage formation with different plasma gases and jet inclinations. For this reason, we investigated how kHz plasma generated in a jet that is known to inflict skin damage interacts with mouse skin and explored how we can reduce the skin damage. Many studies have been conducted in vitro on mouse skin cells, but only a few in vivo where, due to the complexity of the biological system, plasma can cause severe damages.

The possible benefits of an atmospheric pressure plasma jet skin treatment have been tested in vivo on mouse skin.
